Legislation Details

File #: 24-340    Version: 1
Type: Resolution Status: Passed
File created: 6/13/2024 In control: Board of County Commissioners Business Meeting
On agenda: 6/25/2024 Final action: 6/25/2024
Title: Final Decision on Appeal of Case No. CMRS21-001
Attachments: 1. Board Summary Report, 2. Draft Motions, 3. Resolution
To: Board of County Commissioners

Through: Ron Carl, County Attorney

Prepared By:
prepared
Robert Hill, Sr. Asst. County Attorney
end

presenter
Presenter: Robert Hill, Sr. Asst. County Attorney
end

Subject:
title
Final Decision on Appeal of Case No. CMRS21-001
end

Purpose and Request:
recommended action
The Board is requested to adopt and approve a Resolution deciding the appeal of the Planning Division Manager's conditional approval of the Lakeview Park cell tower/CMRS application. The resolution was drafted based on direction provided following the appeal hearing on June 11, 2024, that the approval was not supported by the administrative record and continued for staff to prepare a final resolution for adoption based on such direction. The draft resolution reverses the Planning Division Manager's decision and denies approval of the application.
end

Background and Discussion: On March 25, 2024, the Planning Division Manager of the Public Works and Development Department conditionally approved Case No. CMRS21-001, an application for a concealed freestanding cell tower to replace an existing concealed freestanding tower located in Lakeview Park. Certain residents appealed that decision in accordance with provision for appeal to the Board of County Commissioners in the Land Development Code of such CMRS application decisions. The Board determined to hear the appeal and a hearing was scheduled for June 11, 2024.

Following such hearing the Board moved to continue the matter for adoption of a resolution making the Board's decision on the appeal and provided direction to the County Attorney's Office that the record did not support the approval decision and intending to reverse decision and deny the permit.

The direction provided following the hearing was based on the Board's finding that the Planning Division Manager's decision was not supported by the administrative record in the Case and is not in compliance with the requirements for...

Click here for full text