Legislation Details

File #: 24-443    Version: 1
Type: Resolution Status: Passed
File created: 7/30/2024 In control: Board of County Commissioners Business Meeting
On agenda: 9/10/2024 Final action: 9/10/2024
Title: Approval of a Resolution Authorizing Legal Representation and Indemnification In Litigation Filed Against Three Employees of The Arapahoe County Sheriff's Office
Attachments: 1. Board Summary Report, 2. Resolution
To: Board of County Commissioners

Through: Ron Carl, County Attorney

Prepared By:
prepared
Writer Mott, Deputy County Attorney
end

Subject:
title
Approval of a Resolution Authorizing Legal Representation and Indemnification In Litigation Filed Against Three Employees of The Arapahoe County Sheriff's Office
end

Purpose and Request:
recommended action
On June 24, 2024, Plaintiff Darreayon Webber filed a Second Amended Complaint, captioned Darreayon Webber v. Kevin Hicks, Joshua Sadler Andreas, and Augipito Herrera, Civil No. 23-cv-02128-DDD-MEH in the United States District Court of Colorado alleging deputies Kevin Hicks, Joshua Sadler-Andreas, and Augipito Herrera from the Arapahoe County Sheriff's Office used excessive force when removing him from his cell.

This report and the accompanying resolution seek the Board's formal authorization to provide legal defense services and indemnification coverage for the three ACSO deputies who have been named in the Second Amended Complaint.
end

Background and Discussion:
The lawsuit stems from an incident involving ACSO Inmate Darreayon Webber on April 3, 2023. The lawsuit includes allegations of use of excessive force and a request for compensatory and punitive damages.

Under the provisions of the Colorado Peace Officers Act and the Governmental Immunity Act, a county is obligated to bear the costs of providing a legal defense for its law enforcement officers and officials when they are sued for acts or omissions allegedly committed by them while performing their jobs. Similarly, a county is obligated to indemnify its officers for judgments or settlements that may enter against them for alleged violations of federal constitutional law, excluding punitive damages.

After reviewing the facts and information currently available, and despite certain allegations made by the plaintiff in the Second Amended Complaint filed with the court, the County Attorney's Office has determined that the conduct of the ind...

Click here for full text