Legislation Details

File #: 24-050    Version: 1
Type: Presentation Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 1/18/2024 In control: Board of County Commissioners Study Session
On agenda: 2/6/2024 Final action:
Title: 2:00 PM *Federal Warehouse Easements
Attachments: 1. Board Summary Report, 2. Draft Termination of Declaration and Grant of Easements, 3. Draft Shared Entry Easement Agreement, 4. Reciprocal Easements, 5. Concept Site Plans, 6. Declaration and Grant of Easements (1982), 7. Reciprocal Easement Agreement (1985)
Date Ver.Action ByActionResultAction DetailsMeeting DetailsAudio/Video
No records to display.
To: Board of County Commissioners

Through: Patrick O'Neill, Director, Facilities and Fleet Management

Prepared By:
prepared
Patrick O'Neill, Director, Facilities and Fleet Management
end

presenter
Presenter: Ken Morris, Division Manager,Project Operations, Facilities and Fleet Management, and John Christofferson, Deputy County Attorney
end

Subject:
title
2:00 PM *Federal Warehouse Easements
end

Purpose and Request:
recommended action
The purpose of this drop in is to request approval from the Board of County Commissioners to vacate an existing reciprocal easement at the Federal Warehouse parcel and to execute a new shared entrance drive easement with the owner of the parcel to the north.
end

Background and Discussion: A reciprocal easement agreement was executed on September 12, 1985, between the previous owner of County's Federal Warehouse property and a previous owner of the property to the north as the respective properties were developed in a manner that caused them to appear as a single retail shopping facility. The reciprocal easement allowed for shared ingress, egress, cross-parking, and access over, upon, and across the parking areas of each property. Currently, the property to the north of County's property is in the planning stages with the City of Littleton to be redeveloped as a 55+ apartment community. The developer and County staff agree that the intent of the reciprocal easement is no longer valid, and both parties agree that vacation of this easement is appropriate. However, approximately half of the width of the County's access drive from Federal Boulevard is on property owned by the developer to the north. So, developer and County staff agree that a new easement agreement for a shared entrance drive is necessary and appropriate to maintain ingress and egress for both properties.

Fiscal Impact: No funding is sought from the County in relation to this request.

Alternatives: County could elect to keep the existing reci...

Click here for full text