To: Board of County Commissioners
Through: Bryan D. Weimer, PWLF Director Public Works and Development (PWD)
Prepared By:
prepared
Chuck Haskins, PE, Engineering Division Mgr. PWD
end
presenter
Presenter: Chuck Haskins, PE Engineering Services Division PWD
end
Subject:
title
1:00 PM *Signal Agreement for signal at Picadilly and Radcliff
end
Purpose and Request:
recommended action
The Board is requested to consider authorization for the County to fund signal costs in excess of developer contribution and seek reimbursement of these costs from Developer for a signal that meets warrants for installation.
end
Background and Discussion:
The County and the Developer entered into two Traffic Signal Escrow Agreements (TSEAs), on August 8, 2018, and October 23, 2018, to fund the traffic signal at the intersection of S. Picadilly Street and E. Radcliff Parkway. A total of $300,000 was deposited into a project account to fund the design, construction and installation of the traffic signal. Within the TSEAs, the Developer agreed to be responsible for the total costs to design, construct and install the traffic signal and the $300,000 payment represented only an estimate of the cost of the traffic signal at that time. The Developer acknowledges that it is their responsibility and obligation to design, construct and install the traffic signal in accordance with the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (the "MUTCD") standards.
Recently, the County has determined that the intersection of S. Picadilly Street and E. Radcliff Parkway meets warrants for signal installation pursuant to the MUTCD; and the Developer has requested that the County bid and provide project management services related to installation of the traffic signal. The County is willing to bid and to provide project management services for the work and estimates that the cost of providing these services at $25,000. The County anticipates that the actual cost of the traffic signal to...
Click here for full text