Legislation Details

File #: 26-488    Version: 1
Type: Resolution Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 9/17/2026 In control: Board of County Commissioners Business Meeting
On agenda: 10/13/2026 Final action:
Title: Approval of a resolution authorizing legal representation and indemnification in litigation filed against employee of the Arapahoe County Sheriff’s Office
Attachments: 1. Board Summary Report, 2. Resolution
To: Board of County Commissioners

Through: John Christofferson, Acting County Attorney

Prepared By:
prepared
Writer Mott, Deputy County Attorney
end

Subject:
title
Approval of a resolution authorizing legal representation and indemnification in litigation filed against employee of the Arapahoe County Sheriff’s Office
end

Purpose and Request:
recommended action
A civil rights lawsuit James A. Preston v. Kandi Gonzalez, et al.; Civil No. 26-cv-03557-RTG, was commenced on August 5, 2026 in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado against Deputy Gonzalez from the Arapahoe County Sheriff’s Office, alleging an unreasonable search of Plaintiff’s cellular telephone data, deprivation of due process by publication of sealed records, right to petition/retaliation, and a conspiracy to violate constitutional rights. This memo and the accompanying resolution seek the Board’s formal authorization to provide legal defense services and indemnification coverage for the ACSO personnel who has been named in the suit.
end

Alignment with Strategic Plan: Good Governance - Deliver mandated and essential services with excellence.

Background and Discussion: Under the provisions of the Colorado Peace Officers Act and the Colorado Governmental Immunity Act, a county is obligated to bear the costs of providing a legal defense for its law enforcement officers and officials when they are sued for acts or omissions allegedly committed by them while performing their jobs. Similarly, a county is obligated to indemnify its officers for judgments or settlements that may enter against them for alleged violations of federal constitutional law, excluding punitive damages. After reviewing the facts and information currently available, and despite certain allegations made by the plaintiff in the complaint filed with the court, the County Attorney’s Office has determined that the conduct of the individual deputy named in the lawsuit was not undertaken wantonly or w...

Click here for full text