araphoe county logo
File #: 24-208    Version: 1
Type: Presentation Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 4/1/2024 In control: Board of County Commissioners Study Session
On agenda: 4/16/2024 Final action:
Title: 2:30 PM *Land Development Code Sign Regulations (LDC24-002)
Attachments: 1. Board Summary Report, 2. Presentation, 3. Planning Commission Staff Report, 4. Draft LDC Sign Regulation, 5. LDC Sign Definition Proposed Revisions, 6. LDC Sign Regulation Proposed Revisions, 7. LDC Planned Sign Program Revisions
Date Ver.Action ByActionResultAction DetailsMeeting DetailsAudio/Video
No records to display.
To: Board of County Commissioners

Through: Bryan Weimer, Director, Public Works and Development

Prepared By:
prepared
Kat Hammer, Senior Planner, Public Works and Development
end

presenter
Presenter: Kat Hammer, Senior Planner, Public Works and Development
end

Subject:
title
2:30 PM *Land Development Code Sign Regulations (LDC24-002)
end

Purpose and Request:
recommended action
Staff seeks Board of County Commissioners direction to proceed with an amendment to the Land Development Code (LDC), specifically, Section 4-1.5, Signs, Section 5-4.4, Planned Sign Program, and Chapter 7, Definitions. The proposed amendment is intended to match more common practices and simplify the sign regulations and process.
end

Background and Discussion: The LDC is meant to be a "living document" that reflects current practices in the community. As such, staff proposes when and as appropriate and necessary various updates to the LDC to reflect such current practices in response to new or changing needs. The proposed revisions allow for increased freestanding signage depending on the adjacent street context and the size of parcel(s), changes to the permitted number and size of fascia signs, remove special sign allowances for specific uses, update and include definitions for certain types of signs, and revise the process and clarify the regulations of the Planned Sign Program. The attached Planning Commission staff report and PowerPoint include details of the proposed changes.

Fiscal Impact: None.

Alternatives: The Board has several options:
1. Direct staff to proceed with the proposed amendment.
2. Direct staff to modify or remove the proposed amendment.
3. Request another study session for additional discussion.

Alignment with Strategic Plan:
?Be fiscally sustainable
?Provide essential and mandated service
?Be community focused

Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends the proposed language.

Concurrence: The proposed changes have been reviewed by...

Click here for full text